Now I
realize that it's part of the British psyche to blow things out of
proportion, their tabloid newspapers prove that on a daily basis, but
is a live broadcast dedicated to the choice of a new actor to play a
role that has been around for 50 years and has been played by 11
other people really necessary?
I get that the British betting parlors had nothing better to do after Kate and Will had their flippin' kid (seriously - you people need a life), but to be taking bets on who the next actor to play The Doctor????? To us here in the US, that's like taking bets on who will go to the bathroom next. In other words, it's inconsequential and not that important.
I get that the British betting parlors had nothing better to do after Kate and Will had their flippin' kid (seriously - you people need a life), but to be taking bets on who the next actor to play The Doctor????? To us here in the US, that's like taking bets on who will go to the bathroom next. In other words, it's inconsequential and not that important.
Previously,
the next actor to play The Doctor had been introduced in a blurb in
the Radio Times or some other publication and that was that. There
might have been a picture of them in their new outfit (which kind
of spoils things if you ask me), and a few words from the actor
and that was it.
I get
that “Doctor Who” is now a huge world wide cash cow for
the BBC (and they'd better start putting that money into better
special effects), but I really think they are starting to over
hype things. With this “Doctor Who Live: The Next Doctor”
they are, somewhat embarrassingly, starting to believe the hype and
get a little full of themselves, at least as far as I am concerned.
In
August, 2013, there is no reason why the name of an actor, who will
not appear on or TV screens until a year from now, need be announced.
I know, I know, it takes the mystery out of things and allows them
to film the climactic Christmas episode without a lot of leach-like
paparazzi following their every move trying to figure out what actor
they've brought in for the “Regeneration Scene”, but this over
hyping of the actor's selection could possibly be what brings the
show down in the end.
I truly believe that Moffatt and Company should heed the words of Patrick Troughton on taking over the role of The Doctor from the original, William Hartnell, "I think acting is magic. If I tell you all about myself it will spoil it."
See
that, even Troughton was against spoliers, sweety.
And
I think that's my biggest problem with this whole thing. I grant you
that we over here in the US have not known any actor, except for
maybe Peter Davison from his “All Creatures Great and Small”
days, before they took on the role of The Doctor, or if they were
known, they weren't widely known (like
Eccleston and Tennant), and to me that's
part of the “magic”.
These
actors come to us with no proconceived notions, no baggage from
earlier parts, which is something that makes, in my opinion accepting
a new actor in the role a lot easier.
There
was much hand wringing and gnashing of teeth when it was announced
that Matt Smith was taking over in the role of The Doctor. I was one
of those wringers and gnashers. I loved Dsavid Tennant. He brought
the right amount of fury and comedy to the role an as much as I hated
“The Season of Specials” and what I called “The
10th's Goodbye Tour and Extreme Makeover – TARDIS Edition”,
I, like 10, didn't want him to go, but go he did and Matt Smith took
over.
And you know what??? I am where I was at the end of Tennant's run, but even more so. I wasn't ever actually nervous about the naming of a new Doctor as I am now. From the second that Matt Smith stood down the Atraxi in “The Eleventh Hour” I was hooked on the newly bow tied Doctor who would eventually allow his hat fetish to come out. I'm not going to say that I loved all of the concepts that Moffatt threw out there, especially at the end of Smith's 1st season, where after the events of the Pandorcia, bascially we had a universe that came from Amy's imagination, what I called the “Universe pulled out of Amy's Ass”.
And you know what??? I am where I was at the end of Tennant's run, but even more so. I wasn't ever actually nervous about the naming of a new Doctor as I am now. From the second that Matt Smith stood down the Atraxi in “The Eleventh Hour” I was hooked on the newly bow tied Doctor who would eventually allow his hat fetish to come out. I'm not going to say that I loved all of the concepts that Moffatt threw out there, especially at the end of Smith's 1st season, where after the events of the Pandorcia, bascially we had a universe that came from Amy's imagination, what I called the “Universe pulled out of Amy's Ass”.
Anyway,
I have let my “Matt Love”
get in the way here.
I
truly hope that this over hyping of Smith's replacement does not
raise the expectations of the fans too much, or in contrast, dash
them to pieces. I would just rather be like The Doctor at the end of
“The Eleventh Hour”
when he approaches the newly rebuilt TARDIS in Amy's Aunt's backyard
and says, “OK, what have you got for me
this time?” when it comes to new actor
in the role and I truly hope they are up to what's in store for them,
for even before they have said one word of dialogue or flipped one
switch on the TARDIS console, they will be the most sought after
actor in the world.
As
for me, I hope they go a little older, in the Tennant range. I think
a transition from Smith to an actor that is more than 10 years older
will be unbelievable. Matt's 30 now so a 40ish actor will work and,
to be honest, even though The Doctor can appear to be anyone, by
today's standards, a Doctor in his 50's or older , travelling along
with Clara would be kind of creepy. It was OK in the early 60's when The Doctor was Susan's Grandfather or when Dodo was there with Ben, but to have a 50something Doctor travelling with a 20something companion these days is weird.
Yes, I know that Billie Piper was 19 when she took on the role of Rose, but Eccleston didn't look old and neither did Tennant when he took over.
Yes, I know that Billie Piper was 19 when she took on the role of Rose, but Eccleston didn't look old and neither did Tennant when he took over.
Despite
his youth, Matt Smith could project that he was playing a character
that was over a thousand years old, better even than David Tennant
and Chrostopher Eccleston could. OK, they were in their 900's, but
still, you get the idea and that was the genius in casting Matt Smith
as Doctor Number 11. I truly hope they have that genius this time
and that this extravagaganza on a Sunday afternoon here in the US and
up in Canada (and in the VERY early Aussie
and New Zealand morning on Monday) do not
destroy the show that millions have grown to love.
Jayne
I totally disagree that Smith was more convincingly old that Eccleston and Tennant. For me Eccleston and Tennant were far easy to accept as multi-century aged.
ReplyDeleteI reckon they're going for an actor 40+ this time, but we will soon see!
Maybe it was that Smith was a much younger actor than the other 2 that made his "Old" moments seem that much older - but I just got that feeling that he was a lot older than us mere humans more from Smith than the other two. They blathered about how old they were while Smith actually showed it. Not saying that Smith was/is my fave - just for me that he projected "old" better than the other 2.
ReplyDeleteOkay, a few points:
ReplyDeleteNow that Peter Capaldi has been announced as the 12th Doctor, we are getting an actor in his 50s — the same age, actually, as William Hartnell was when he first portrayed the character. The dynamic now between the Doctor and his companions can be similar to what Sylvester McCoy's 7th had with Sophie Aldred's Ace: a father-daughter dynamic, or father-son, or teacher-pupil, whatever you want to call it. It would be a refreshing change from the unrequited romance between the Time Lord and his female companions.
Billie Piper's character was 19 when she was first introduced. The actress herself was in her twenties, and she turns thirty-one next month.
When you know the sex of a person to whom you refer, use sex-specific pronouns. Even when you don't know a person's sex, don't ever use plural personal pronouns. It's lazy and confusing to the reader, who doesn't know if you're referring to one person or more than one. All the actors who've played the Doctor have been male, so you can use 'he', 'him', and 'his' to refer to an individual.
Smith did have the wonderful ability to act much older than his years, but he also tempered that by often acting much younger. Eccleston and Tennant acted more or less their apparent ages, so Smith's take was a pleasant interpretation. Now that we're getting someone older, it'll be intriguing to see how he plays it.
I concur that the hype was overdone. Granted, it's not every year a show celebrates its fiftieth anniversary, but this was blown way out of proportion.